Objective　To investigate the risk factors for positive margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, and to follow up the recurrence. Methods　The endoscopic, clinical and pathological data of 489 patients with early gastric cancer or precancerous lesions treated by ESD in Fujian Provincial Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. They were categorized into a negative group (371 cases), a low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN)-positive group (79 cases), and a high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or cancer-positive group (39 cases) according to the different margins. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for positive margins, the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare the risk of recurrence in different margin groups, and the Cox proportional risk regression model to explore the associated factors that caused recurrence in those with positive margins. Results　In the 489 patients, the positive resection margin rate was 24.1% (118/489), of which HGIN or cancer accounted for 33.1% (39/118). LGIN-positive margin was more likely to occur for lesions larger than 10 cm2 (OR=1.58, 95%CI: 1.13-2.08, P=0.033), in the presence of ulcers (OR=2.92, 95%CI: 1.37-4.54, P=0.012) and for 1-2 years of ESD experience [OR=1.69 (1-2 years VS 5-6 years), 95%CI: 1.51-1.94, P=0.026]. Those located in the upper 1/3 of the stomach [OR=3.64 (upper 1/3 VS lower 1/3), 95%CI: 1.27-5.50 P=0.010] and submucosal infiltration (SM1 VS M1+M2: OR=2.37, 95%CI: 1.04-5.72, P=0.028; SM2 VS M1+M2: OR=6.08, 95%CI: 1.31-12.75, P=0.002) were high risk factors for HGIN/cancer-positive margin. Postoperative follow-up was completed in 337 patients, with a median follow-up time of 26.0 (22) months. The overall cumulative recurrence was 5.3% (18/337), 2.1% (5/239) in the negative margin group, 8.3% (6/72) in the LGIN-positive margin group, and 26.9% (7/26) in the HGIN/cancer-positive group, with statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (P<0.05). Risk factors for recurrence in the positive margin group included positive basal margins (HR=5.17, 95%CI: 1.47-14.09, P=0.011) and SM1 invasion (HR=4.82, 95%CI: 1.38-14.77, P=0.013). Conclusion　Positive margins after ESD for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions are related to lesion location, size, presence of ulceration, depth of infiltration, and endoscopists'' experience. The overall risk of recurrence is higher in those with positive margins than in those with negative margins. Additional treatments need to be considered comprehensively for those with submucosal invasion and positive basal margins.