目的评价内镜切除直径>2~4 cm胃间质瘤的安全性和长期疗效。方法收集2014年1月—2019年12月在福建省立医院、福建省立金山医院和福建省老年医院接受内镜或外科治疗,经术后病理证实为胃间质瘤且直径≤4 cm的病例307例,将肿瘤直径>2~4 cm的病例采用倾向性评分(1∶1)匹配后,对内镜组(41例)和外科组(41例)病例的手术相关不良事件发生情况及临床治疗结果进行对照分析。结果内镜组较外科组中位手术时间明显缩短(580 min比1080 min,Z=-4789,P<0001),中位住院费用明显减少(227万元比420万元,Z=-7164,P<0001),术后禁食时间、术后住院时间2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>005)。内镜组有7例(171%)发生并发症,包括术后急性感染5例、术后穿孔和术后出血各1例;外科组有9例(220%)发生并发症,均为术后急性感染。2组并发症总体发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0311,P=0577)。2组均为完全切除(切缘无肿瘤残留),内镜组随访时间(343±156)个月,外科组随访时间(422±202)个月,2组随访期间均无复发或远处转移病例。结论内镜切除较大胃间质瘤(直径>2~4 cm)是一种安全且长期有效的治疗方法,可作为治疗胃肠间质瘤的手段之一。 目的评价内镜切除直径>2~4 cm胃间质瘤的安全性和长期疗效。方法收集2014年1月—2019年12月在福建省立医院、福建省立金山医院和福建省老年医院接受内镜或外科治疗,经术后病理证实为胃间质瘤且直径≤4 cm的病例307例,将肿瘤直径>2~4 cm的病例采用倾向性评分(1∶1)匹配后,对内镜组(41例)和外科组(41例)病例的手术相关不良事件发生情况及临床治疗结果进行对照分析。结果内镜组较外科组中位手术时间明显缩短(580 min比1080 min,Z=-4789,P<0001),中位住院费用明显减少(227万元比420万元,Z=-7164,P<0001),术后禁食时间、术后住院时间2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>005)。内镜组有7例(171%)发生并发症,包括术后急性感染5例、术后穿孔和术后出血各1例;外科组有9例(220%)发生并发症,均为术后急性感染。2组并发症总体发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0311,P=0577)。2组均为完全切除(切缘无肿瘤残留),内镜组随访时间(343±156)个月,外科组随访时间(422±202)个月,2组随访期间均无复发或远处转移病例。结论内镜切除较大胃间质瘤(直径>2~4 cm)是一种安全且长期有效的治疗方法,可作为治疗胃肠间质瘤的手段之一。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and long term efficacy of endoscopic resection of gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of >2 4 cm. MethodsThe clinical data of 307 patients, who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection and pathologically confirmed to be gastric stromal tumors with a diameter ≤4 cm in Fujian Provincial Hospital, Jinshan Branch of Fujian Provincial Hospital or Fujian Geriatric Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019, were collected. The propensity score matching (1∶1) was performed for the cases with the tumor size of >2 4 cm.Then the incidence of adverse events related to the operation and clinical outcomes were compared between 41 patients in the endoscopic group and 41 patients in the surgical group. ResultsCompared with the surgical group, the median operation time in the endoscopic group was significantly shorter (580 min VS 1080 min, Z=-4789,P<0001), and the median hospitalization cost was significantly lower (227 thousand yuan VS 420 thousand yuan, Z=-7164, P<0001). There were no significant differences in postoperative fasting time or postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups (P>005). Complications occurred in 7 cases (171%) in the endoscopy group, including 5 cases of postoperative acute infection, 1 case of postoperative perforation, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding; all 9 cases (220%) in the surgical group developed postoperative acute infection. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0311, P=0577). Tumors in both groups were completely removed with negative resection margins. The follow up time of the endoscopy group was 343±156 months, and that of the surgical group was 422±202 months. No recurrence or distant metastasis was observed during the follow up period in the two groups. ConclusionEndoscopic resection of large gastric stromal tumor (range>2 4 cm) is safe and effective in the long term, which can be used as one of the methods for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.