Logo 知识与财富的链接
水力负荷及固相碳源对BAF+多级土壤渗滤组合工艺处理污水的影响研究

水力负荷及固相碳源对BAF+多级土壤渗滤组合工艺处理污水的影响研究

ISSN:0253-2468
2012年第32卷第8期
研究报告
严森[1]    吴为中[2]    杨春平[3]    湛建宇[4]    曾光明[3]    陈佳利[3]    于茜[3] YAN Sen,WU Weizhong,YANG Chunping,CHEN Jianyu,ZENG Guangming,CHEN Jiali and YU Qian
  1. 湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,长沙410082 环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室湖南大学,长沙410082 北京大学环境科学与工程学院,北京100871
  2. 北京大学环境科学与工程学院,北京,100871
  3. 湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,长沙410082 环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室湖南大学,长沙410082
  4. 环境保护部华南环境科学研究所,广州,510655
YAN Sen1,2,3,WU Weizhong3,YANG Chunping1,2,CHEN Jianyu4,ZENG Guangming1,2,CHEN Jiali1,2,YU Qian1,2 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082 2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082 3. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871 4. South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655

碳源的选择及曝气量的控制是影响多级土壤渗滤系统(multi-soil-laying,即MSL)脱氮效果的重要因素.试验采用BAF+MSL两段式新型组合工艺,避免了传统MSL曝气过量抑制反硝化脱氮的风险.考察了不同水力负荷下,BAF+MSL对生活污水的净化效果,并比较研究了以聚丁二酸丁二醇酯(PBS)为反硝化碳源的MSL-1及木屑为碳源的MSL-2的脱氮除磷效果.结果表明,不同水力负荷下,系统对SS平均去除率为94.08%,对COD的去除率均在80%以上,出水COD在20mg·L-1以下.水力负荷对系统BAF段硝化性能影响较小,对MSL反硝化脱氮影响较大.BAF水力负荷为0.5、1及2m·3m-·2d-1时,BAF对NH4+-N的去除率均在90%以上,对TN的平均去除率依次为26.53%、11.09%、5.71%;对应MSL段水力负荷分别为0.25、0.50及1m·3m-·2d-1时,MSL-1对TN平均去除率分别为87.39%、65.09%、45.56%,MSL-2平均去除率依次为61.51%、42.52%、31.32%.MSL-1脱氮性能明显优于MSL-2,而两者除磷效果区别较小.随着水力负荷增大,MSL对TP去除率依次降低,MSL-1对TP平均去除率最高为91.97%.

Carbon source and aeration rate are the important factors affecting the removal efficiency of Multi-soil-layering (MSL) system. A new two-stage combined process of BAF+MSL was designed for purifying domestic wastewater under different hydraulic loading rate (HLR). Poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) and sawdust were used as carbon source in MSL-1 and MSL-2, respectively. Comparative studies on performance of nitrogen and phosphorus removal between MSL-1 and MSL-2 were also investigated. The result showed that the average removal efficiency of SS and COD were 94.08% and 80%, respectively, and the COD concentration in the effluent was below 20 mg·L-1. The influence of HLR on denitrification of MSL was more significant than that on nitrification of BAF. When the HLR of BAF were 0.5, 1 and 2 m3·m-2·d-1 respectively, the removal efficiency of NH4+-N was above 90%, and the TN removal efficiency were 26.53%, 11.09% and 5.71%, respectively. The corresponding HLR of MSL were 0.25, 0.5 and 1 m3·m-2·d-1, the TN removal efficiency of MSL-1 were 87.39%, 65.09% and 45.56%, respectively. In comparison, the removal efficiency of MSL-2 were 61.51%, 42.52% and 31.32%, respectively. Although the TN removal efficiency of MSL-1 was better than that of MSL-2, the TP removal efficiency of MSL-1 was similar to MSL-2. As the HLR increased, the TP removal efficiency reduced. The highest average TP removal efficiency of MSL-1 was 91.97%.

认领
收 藏
点 赞
认领进度
0 %

发表评论

ISSN:0253-2468
2012年第32卷第8期
研究报告

用户信息设置