The cleanup method of modified low temperature was compared with the standardized method of modified ultrasound-assisted liquid–liquid (UALL) extraction for the analysis of 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in olive oil and refined pomace olive oil. The modified UALL extraction consisted in purification on C₁₈ reversed-phase, Florisil-bonded-phase and NH₂ cartridges, and modified low-temperature extraction was followed by alumina-N and NH₂ solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges. Both methods are followed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. The chromatograms of the final extracts showed lower interferences in both of the methods. The solvent consumption and cost for the modified UALL method were higher than those of the modified low temperature, and also, it needed more equipment, but its analysis time was less. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the modified UALL method were 0.16–0.97 and 0.57–2.93 μg kg^?1, respectively, and for the modified low temperature, they were 0.09–1.97 and 0.29–5.99 μg kg^?1, respectively. The PAH recoveries for the modified UALL extraction method ranged from 75.0 to 111.0 % (RSD?=?3–8 %), and for the modified low temperature, they ranged from 81.5 to 113.8 % (RSD?=?3–10 %).