本世纪初,受英国文化学家雷蒙·威廉斯的影响,国内学界兴起"关键词"热,以"关键词"为关键词的论文、著作和丛书时有发表和出版。进入21世纪的第二个十年,关键词研究陷入困境:一是分科治学模式导致对研究对象的切割,二是辞典释义模式导致关键词阐释的非语境化,三是经义至上模式导致对关键词之现代价值的遮蔽。关键词研究如何走出困境?就入思路径而言,其理有三:突破"分科治学"模式,实现对关键词的整体观照和系统阐释;突破"辞典释义"模式,开启关键词阐释的生命历程法;发掘"元典关键词"之文化宝库,为中华文明的现代传承与新变提供语义及思想资源。就研究方法而论,其道有三:以"资格审查法"遴选关键词,以"形分神合法"类分关键词,以"生命历程法"阐释关键词。
At the turn of the century, key words researching sprang up in domestic academic circles under the influence of Raymond Williams, who was a culture scientist in England. Now and then a series of books and papers which used "key words" as the key words came out. By the second decade of the 21 st century, key words researching gets into trouble. Firstly, the departmental system makes objects scattering; secondly, the explanatory models of making a dictionary lead to de-conte-xtualized explanations; at last, Confucian classics argumentation supremacy close over the value of key words. So, how to find a way out of the dilemma for key words researching? There are three solutions: to begin with, break through the departmental system and explain the key words systematically; moreover, break the explanatory model in dictionary and apply lifecourse theory to key words explaining; finally, explore Meta-code key words for the inheriting and innovation of Chinese culture. As for the methodology, there are three solutions, too. First of all, choose the key words; in the second part, classify the key words; in the final part, apply life-course theory to key words explaining.